Open letter # 2: An urgent request regarding research showing the S-Protein is a toxin

To: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern <>, Hon David Parker <>, Hon Andrew Little <>, Hon Chris Hipkins <>, <>, Chris James <>, <>

Dear Prime Minister, Attorney-General, Minister of Health, Minister of Covid, Minister or Seniors, Director General of Health and Chris


I attach below some new and very important research which I must assume your advisors have not yet provided to you, or the experimental Pfizer injection rollout would surely already have been suspended.


It is now clearly established that the S-Protein [spike protein] is a toxin that causes the harmful symptoms known as “Covid”.


I surely don’t need to explain the legal, ethical and human rights consequences of a government knowingly promoting a program which intentionally injects a life threatening toxin into healthy people.


I also attach a report indicating that injected nanoparticles (and the S-Protein) do not remain in the arm muscle but instead circulate throughout the whole body.


The combined effect is that the Pfizer jab injects mRNA to take over cells to manufacture the deadly S-Protein toxin and this spread throughout much of the body, manufacturing the S-Protein toxin for days and in some cases many weeks.


This explains why even the limited available research from the two months of study as summarised in the Comirnaty Data Sheet identifies possible harm to many different parts of the body including the heart, blood, brain, musculoskeletal system, nervous system, fainting and dizziness etc.


This is no longer just a shocking experiment. Everyone involved is now on notice of this “injection roulette” which may result in death or serious injury to previously healthy people. The health and safety implications for employers and those who push this jab, are significant.


No post injection death can legitimately be ruled out as being caused or contributed by the injection, at least not without a full coroner’s report. Certainly any post vax stroke, heart attack, other blood disorder, nervous system disorder or even suicide or car accident (known overseas as “vaccidents”) must prima facie be assumed to be caused or contributed to by the jab, at least until a full coroners report is undertaken.


Similarly it is not good enough to claim that our seniors who die post jab were frail and likely to die. Surely if they were that frail they should have been spared from the jab. Anyway, surely “deaths post Jab” should be treated consistently with “deaths post Covid”.


Despite the secretive, flawed and very passive official post jab injury reporting process ( CARM), and as a result of the more active community led follow up, you are already on notice of a number of deaths and life threatening and life changing harm from this injection. The deaths and harm will inevitably continue if there are any further injections. Perhaps initially you had an excuse that you thought the S-Protein was “safe”. However now you are on notice that it is not “safe” by any definition.


Further, although you in privileged position are on notice, many members of the public who you were elected to represent remain deceived by misleading claims in crown propaganda that the jab is “safe and effective”. In these circumstances there can be no “Informed consent”. Each jab without Informed Consent is in breach of the Health and Disability Code and is an assault.


In these circumstances, the ongoing program is surely criminal, and indeed may result in Homicide as defined by the Crimes Act:

158 Homicide defined

Homicide is the killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever.

Compare: 1908 No 32 s 173

Anyone who aids, abets or otherwise incites homicide is a party to that homicide.


I note that the Director-General of Health has shared his view in sworn evidence that Covid is the most serious health issue for New Zealand in 100 years.


I invite you all to consider that claim very carefully and critically. Please put Covid in perspective against the many other challenges which we face, including for example heart attacks, strokes, cancer, suicide accidents and diabetes and the nitrate and other contamination of much of our water.


Surely you must agree that the harm is not from “Covid” but from the “Response to Covid”.


The best expert evidence is that the risk from Covid is similar to the risk from influenza. Many experts are now saying that Covid is simply a rebranding of influenza and colds, supported by PCR testing that was never intended as a diagnostic tool. The WHO says that PCR testing should not be used beyond 20-25 cycles. OIA responses indicate that in NZ PCR tests use up to 45 cycles, which simply multiplies any contamination.


Our government is about to enter dangerous new phase if it proceeds to inject more healthy New Zealanders with an injection that experts have established is toxic.


Apart from the direct harm to those who choose, or are bullied to accept this injection, there is considerable peripheral harm. This includes the contamination of our Blood Bank with S-Protein. We can only speculate on the risks for vulnerable people who receive blood contaminated with this toxin.


Please stop and reflect. Please listen to international experts who are independent from Big Pharma and who are not invested in the Covid paradigm.


Please listen to the New Zealand scientific and medical experts who have put their careers and reputations on the line out of extreme concern.


Please correct the misinformation that this injection is “safe and effective” and “approved by Medsafe” when in fact it did not meet the statutory criteria that “benefit exceeds risk”.


There is no imminent health risk from suspending the program. Dr Bloomfield’s sworn evidence was that the risks were mainly financial and reputational.


Please find the courage to challenge whoever is driving this, and any who act on dogma rather than evidence, reason or ethics.

The future of New Zealand depends on your courage to step up and make this critical call for our people.

I urge you to listen, engage and act in the public interest.

Please put aside your pride and the dogma, and suspend this program.

I am happy to assist however I can.

Sue Grey LLB (Hons), BSc (Biochemistry and Microbiology), RSHDipPHI Co-leader NZ Outdoors Party (

Open letter to Attorney-General regarding the Govt illegal vaccination campaign

Open letter sent to the Attorney- General – David Parker, Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Andrew Little, Ashley Bloomfield, Chris James, Judith Collins, James Shaw, David Seymour from Sue Grey, lawyer regarding the experimental Pfizer injection and other matters

Dear David

I’m somewhat taken aback by your admission that you don’t read your mail (and the implicit suggestion that nobody in your team refers important correspondence to you despite it also going to the Solicitor-General and senior Crown Law staff as well as the Prime Minister and other Ministers with relevant responsibilities).
If this is correct, and a lawyer’s letter identifying a clearly set out and well reasoned breach of the law by government can just be glossed over in the way you suggest, then democratic representation truly has failed us and our current system is no longer fit for purpose.
If you cannot be contacted on your parliamentary address: please advise how you can be contacted.
You may be aware that I represent a large number of concerned New Zealanders who have invested in an urgent High Court challenge to highlight the risks with the experimental Pfizer “jab”. The government has not consulted at any stage of its ad hoc Covid response, and it has no social licence for its actions. As a result, a large number of New Zealanders have lost confidence in your representation. You rely on patently incorrect claims by a single employee that this is the biggest public health challenge for 100 years.
One only need to look at our very concerning heart attack, stroke, mental health and car accident statistics to realise this claim is patently incorrect.
Further international research shows that there are now many effective safe and effective prophylactics and treatments for Covid. The reliance on an experimental injection of a know toxin ( the S protein), the contamination of our blood bank, and the associated bullying of anyone who questions it is irresponsible, if not criminal.
I’m sure you will recall that I have met you in the past several times, including when I personally briefed you about the Supreme Court finding of apparent bias by then Supreme Court Justice Bill Wilson. This senior judge was subsequently forced to resign by acting Attorney-General Judith Collins for misleading his colleagues.
We met again when the Hunua Community sought to stop the intentional poisoning of the Hunua, Auckland water catchment with the deadly poison sodium fluoroacetate (also known as “1080”). This is the same deadly poison that resulted in Jeremy Kerr being convicted of blackmail and jailed for many years after he threatened to contaminate baby formula with it, and posted enough 1080 poison (according to the sentencing judge) to kill up to 30 or so babies. It is the same poison that was used to kill a so-called rat plague in Buller.  When dead rats washed up on West Coast beaches at the mouth of the Buller Rivers together with poisoned fish and seabirds soon afterwards, the government invented a “Pied Piper” type story, rather than admit the most likely cause of death as being the deadly 1080 poison that was aerially spread to poison them. 1080 is continuing to be aerially spread on our forest and water courses, devastating our iconic kea population as well as numerous other native birds, pet dogs, stock, deer and soil and water microorganisms and invertebrates. It is contaminating the food chain and either locked into the soil or animal bones to cause ongoing contamination, or is breaking down to the greenhouse gas Methyl Fluoride.
Please listen when I take time to draw your urgent attention to another government created crisis for New Zealand. This time it involves the experimental injection of the novel Pfizer Vaccine. It’s mechanism is to manufacture the toxic “S” Protein in the cells of injected New Zealanders, including our most vulnerable citizens.
By the emergency law change, you appear to have accepted the approval was unlawful.  The evidence of safety, product integrity and efficacy was so deficient that neither the Minister’s representative ( Chris James) nor his various expert advisors, felt able to conclude that the benefits exceeded the risks. None claimed this experimental injection met the criteria   in s21 and 22 of the Medicines Act for approval of a new poison. Instead they tried to slip it in the backdoor via a section designed for medicines required only for a small number of patients. Despite this it is blazenly being pushed on every adult in New Zealand, including with duress for many due to the “No Jab No Job” policy. No New Zealanders are able to give Informed consent because the on-line trained Vaccinators do not have access to necessary information of risks, benefits, uncertainties and alternatives to facilitate this.
Since we were in court new research has highlighted that: a) the “S”Protein is itself a toxin and that b) it does not stay in muscle cells, but instead is frequently found in the blood and various organs. New Zealand has already seen numerous post vaccination deaths and debilitating adverse effects. I have recently moved referred 18 different cases to your advisors at Crown law. Few of these seem to have been reported onto the CARM register highlighting the gross inadequacies of the current system.
Further it is extremely concerning that interested members of the public are readily able to access information about the harm from this experimental injection, and the obvious lack of informed consent and breaches of the Health and Disability Code,  yet our well paid representatives apparently are not. We are living through another “Unfortunate Experiment” of a scale much larger than the Same Sylvia Cartwright Cervical Cancer Inquiry,  but this time our elected and employed representatives are squarely on notice, and the public is watching your response.
I urge you to set aside time to meet with me at the first opportunity so I can talk you through the important information that you are apparently not receiving or understanding.
The public elected you and your colleagues to represent our interests – not those of Pfizer or any other international interests. Please prove that democracy is still alive and allocate some time to listen to the people you represent.
Thank you and regards
Sue Grey LLB (Hons), BSc
PO Box 1653 Nelson, NZ
pH +64 22 6910586

Stroke/Death following Comirnaty vaccine in elderly care facility

Adverse events reported from Tauranga:  “Two people in our elderly care facility who were on anti-coagulants were adversely affected by the Comirnaty vaccine. One had breathing difficulties and was admitted to hospital, where he was taken off the anti-coagulants and has returned to the facility and is on the mend. The other had a stroke within 24 hours and died three days later.” (anonymous)