Open letter to Attorney-General regarding the Govt illegal vaccination campaign

Open letter sent to the Attorney- General – David Parker, Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Andrew Little, Ashley Bloomfield, Chris James, Judith Collins, James Shaw, David Seymour from Sue Grey, lawyer regarding the experimental Pfizer injection and other matters

Dear David

I’m somewhat taken aback by your admission that you don’t read your mail (and the implicit suggestion that nobody in your team refers important correspondence to you despite it also going to the Solicitor-General and senior Crown Law staff as well as the Prime Minister and other Ministers with relevant responsibilities).
If this is correct, and a lawyer’s letter identifying a clearly set out and well reasoned breach of the law by government can just be glossed over in the way you suggest, then democratic representation truly has failed us and our current system is no longer fit for purpose.
If you cannot be contacted on your parliamentary address: please advise how you can be contacted.
You may be aware that I represent a large number of concerned New Zealanders who have invested in an urgent High Court challenge to highlight the risks with the experimental Pfizer “jab”. The government has not consulted at any stage of its ad hoc Covid response, and it has no social licence for its actions. As a result, a large number of New Zealanders have lost confidence in your representation. You rely on patently incorrect claims by a single employee that this is the biggest public health challenge for 100 years.
One only need to look at our very concerning heart attack, stroke, mental health and car accident statistics to realise this claim is patently incorrect.
Further international research shows that there are now many effective safe and effective prophylactics and treatments for Covid. The reliance on an experimental injection of a know toxin ( the S protein), the contamination of our blood bank, and the associated bullying of anyone who questions it is irresponsible, if not criminal.
I’m sure you will recall that I have met you in the past several times, including when I personally briefed you about the Supreme Court finding of apparent bias by then Supreme Court Justice Bill Wilson. This senior judge was subsequently forced to resign by acting Attorney-General Judith Collins for misleading his colleagues.
We met again when the Hunua Community sought to stop the intentional poisoning of the Hunua, Auckland water catchment with the deadly poison sodium fluoroacetate (also known as “1080”). This is the same deadly poison that resulted in Jeremy Kerr being convicted of blackmail and jailed for many years after he threatened to contaminate baby formula with it, and posted enough 1080 poison (according to the sentencing judge) to kill up to 30 or so babies. It is the same poison that was used to kill a so-called rat plague in Buller.  When dead rats washed up on West Coast beaches at the mouth of the Buller Rivers together with poisoned fish and seabirds soon afterwards, the government invented a “Pied Piper” type story, rather than admit the most likely cause of death as being the deadly 1080 poison that was aerially spread to poison them. 1080 is continuing to be aerially spread on our forest and water courses, devastating our iconic kea population as well as numerous other native birds, pet dogs, stock, deer and soil and water microorganisms and invertebrates. It is contaminating the food chain and either locked into the soil or animal bones to cause ongoing contamination, or is breaking down to the greenhouse gas Methyl Fluoride.
Please listen when I take time to draw your urgent attention to another government created crisis for New Zealand. This time it involves the experimental injection of the novel Pfizer Vaccine. It’s mechanism is to manufacture the toxic “S” Protein in the cells of injected New Zealanders, including our most vulnerable citizens.
By the emergency law change, you appear to have accepted the approval was unlawful.  The evidence of safety, product integrity and efficacy was so deficient that neither the Minister’s representative ( Chris James) nor his various expert advisors, felt able to conclude that the benefits exceeded the risks. None claimed this experimental injection met the criteria   in s21 and 22 of the Medicines Act for approval of a new poison. Instead they tried to slip it in the backdoor via a section designed for medicines required only for a small number of patients. Despite this it is blazenly being pushed on every adult in New Zealand, including with duress for many due to the “No Jab No Job” policy. No New Zealanders are able to give Informed consent because the on-line trained Vaccinators do not have access to necessary information of risks, benefits, uncertainties and alternatives to facilitate this.
Since we were in court new research has highlighted that: a) the “S”Protein is itself a toxin and that b) it does not stay in muscle cells, but instead is frequently found in the blood and various organs. New Zealand has already seen numerous post vaccination deaths and debilitating adverse effects. I have recently moved referred 18 different cases to your advisors at Crown law. Few of these seem to have been reported onto the CARM register highlighting the gross inadequacies of the current system.
Further it is extremely concerning that interested members of the public are readily able to access information about the harm from this experimental injection, and the obvious lack of informed consent and breaches of the Health and Disability Code,  yet our well paid representatives apparently are not. We are living through another “Unfortunate Experiment” of a scale much larger than the Same Sylvia Cartwright Cervical Cancer Inquiry,  but this time our elected and employed representatives are squarely on notice, and the public is watching your response.
I urge you to set aside time to meet with me at the first opportunity so I can talk you through the important information that you are apparently not receiving or understanding.
The public elected you and your colleagues to represent our interests – not those of Pfizer or any other international interests. Please prove that democracy is still alive and allocate some time to listen to the people you represent.
Thank you and regards
Sue Grey LLB (Hons), BSc
PO Box 1653 Nelson, NZ
pH +64 22 6910586

VaxChallenge: Nga Kaitiaki Tuku Ihu Medical Action Society Incorporated v The Minister of Health – Court Decision

Press release.  18/05/2021

VaxChallenge: Nga Kaitiaki Tuku Ihu Medical Action Society Incorporated v The Minister of Health – Court Decision

The High Court has just released its decision on the urgent challenge to the Pfizer vaccine approval and vaccination rollout plan, agreeing with the plaintiff that it was reasonably arguable that the Minister’s approval was unlawful.

Her Honour Justice Ellis has agreed that everyone in New Zealand over 16 is not a limited number of patients, and so the decision is arguably ultra vires the requirements of s23 of the Medicines Act, and she has urged the government to reconsider the lawfulness of the provisional consent they granted for the Pfizer vaccine.

Her Honour stopped short of ordering the vaccine rollout to stop, out of concern of undermining public confidence in the vaccine and wasting vaccine stock that is already in New Zealand.


Call Alan Simmons

0274 980 304


Nga Kaitiaki Tuku Ihu Medical Action Society Incorporated

Press release 10th May 2021



Doctors and large contingent of interested public are expected to travel from around New Zealand  to the High Court Wellington for the “Vax Challenge” this Wednesday.

Doctors and medical people from all over NZ have indicated they intend to travel to Wellington to attend High Court proceedings against the Prime Minister and five other Ministry of Health officials including Dr Ashley Bloomfield.

Nga Kaitiaki Tuku Iho Medical Society Inc. have been given an urgent hearing before the High Court to argue the legality of the approval of the Pfizer Vaccine which has only  been given provisional consent for the novel Pfizer mRNA vaccine to be used on a restricted basis for the treatment of a limited number of patients.

Provisional consent was granted after the Minister’s delegate Chris James of Medsafe decided that there were too many information gaps and uncertainties for full approval to be given. Instead he gazetted “provisional consent” subject to 58 conditions. These required more information about the safety and efficacy of this new injection and integrity of the manufacturing process.

Lawyers Sue Grey and Warren Pike acting for the applicant will argue the matter before the High Court at 10am Wednesday 12th May with Crown Law defending the Governments actions.  Large numbers of interested doctors, patients, bullied employees and representatives from groups who are concerned about the loss of democracy and body sovereignty are expected to attend from all over NZ. Union leaders have also indicated they are watching with interest, as the outcome has an important bearing on the recent “No Jab No Job” legislation of the Government.

Alan Simmons, Board member of Ngi Katiaki Tku Iho  said “The legality of the Vaccine is of extreme importance, as people are being threatened with loss of jobs if they decline this experimental vaccine. The publicly disclosed documents from Medsafe indicate their are many concerns about the safety of this injection. Already many deaths have been reported post vaccination. Many others have had to take time off work to recover from debilitating effects after receiving the jab. Many concerns about the injection are shared by doctors who signed an Open Letter. Alan went on to say “We have had a massive amount of public support from diverse interests. One Wellington doctor has commented that he didn’t want his surgery in two years time to be loaded with patients who had serious long term side effects from an experimental vaccine that was not necessary while Covid was not present in NZ. Nurses and staff in Retirement Villages have reported bullying for even questioning the safety of the vaccine for pregnant colleagues and seniors on medications ”

The Case is CIV-2021-485-181 Nga Kaitiaki Tuku Iho Medical Society Inc v Minister of Health, the Director General Of Health,  Christopher James,  the Prime Minister of NZ, the Minister of Covid Response and the Attorney-General.  The case is scheduled for a 10am start at the High Court, Wellington on Wednesday 12th May 2021


Ph Alan Simmons for any further information.

0274 980 304